Michael A. Gilbert began studying philosophy in 1962 at what was then Hunter College in the Bronx, a part of the City University of New York, and has yet to stop. His first field of research is Argumentation Theory, an interdisciplinary area including scholars from Philosophy, Linguistics, Social Psychology, and Communication Theory. His approach is radical insofar as it places emphasis and demands credibility for non-logical modes of communication. Information in arguments is exchanged not through statements, but through messages which include familiar meaning, context, bodily communications, power relations, and intuitions to list but a few of the many resources ordinary people use.
More...
Gilbert’s second area of research which sometimes overlaps, is Gender and Transgender Theory. There he investigates the foundation and nature of the socially constructed gender binary, and examines its institutional and social implementation. In particular, he focuses on the role of gender diversity as an activity that disrupts the norm and unsettles the binary. As a life-long cross-dresser he investigates that practice both as Michael and as his femme alter ego, Miqqi Alicia Gilbert with an eye toward re-establishing cross-dressing as an opportunity for personal growth and exploration.
Degrees
Ph.D., University of Waterloo
BA, City University of New York
Community Contributions
2013 Three Pillars of Argumentation. York Circle. Sept 28 2013. 2013 Introduction of Panel: Gender Diverse Children. Painting a Rainbow. 25 Sept 2013. 2012 The Joke’s On Us: The Acceptability of Trans Discrimination. Canadian Association for the Prevention of Discrimination and Harassment in Higher Education. Toronto, ON May 2-5, 2012. 2012 The Joke’s On Us: The Acceptability of Trans Discrimination. Canadian Association for the Prevention of Discrimination and Harassment in Higher Education. Toronto, ON May 2-5, 2012.
Research Interests
Philosophy
, Gender Issues, Critical Reasoning, Argumentation Theory, Informal Logic,
Philosophy
Michael A. Gilbert began studying philosophy in 1962 at what was then Hunter College in the Bronx, a part of the City University of New York, and has yet to stop. His first field of research is Argumentation Theory, an interdisciplinary area including scholars from Philosophy, Linguistics, Social Psychology, and Communication Theory. His approach is radical insofar as it places emphasis and demands credibility for non-logical modes of communication. Information in arguments is exchanged not through statements, but through messages which include familiar meaning, context, bodily communications, power relations, and intuitions to list but a few of the many resources ordinary people use.
Gilbert’s second area of research which sometimes overlaps, is Gender and Transgender Theory. There he investigates the foundation and nature of the socially constructed gender binary, and examines its institutional and social implementation. In particular, he focuses on the role of gender diversity as an activity that disrupts the norm and unsettles the binary. As a life-long cross-dresser he investigates that practice both as Michael and as his femme alter ego, Miqqi Alicia Gilbert with an eye toward re-establishing cross-dressing as an opportunity for personal growth and exploration.
Degrees
Ph.D., University of Waterloo
BA, City University of New York
Community Contributions
2013 Three Pillars of Argumentation. York Circle. Sept 28 2013. 2013 Introduction of Panel: Gender Diverse Children. Painting a Rainbow. 25 Sept 2013. 2012 The Joke’s On Us: The Acceptability of Trans Discrimination. Canadian Association for the Prevention of Discrimination and Harassment in Higher Education. Toronto, ON May 2-5, 2012. 2012 The Joke’s On Us: The Acceptability of Trans Discrimination. Canadian Association for the Prevention of Discrimination and Harassment in Higher Education. Toronto, ON May 2-5, 2012.
Research Interests
Philosophy
, Gender Issues, Critical Reasoning, Argumentation Theory, Informal Logic,
Philosophy
All Publications
Book Reviews
2008 Ekins, Richard, and Dave King.
The Transgender Phenomenon. Transgender Tapestry #115.
2008
2008 Girshick, Lori B. Transgender Voices: Beyond Women and Men. 2008. Transgender Tapestry #115
2008
2008 Brown, Mildred L., and Chloe Ann Rounsley. True Selves : Understanding Transsexualism--for Families, Friends, Coworkers, and Helping Professionals. Transgender Tapestry #115
2008
2008 Valentine, David.
Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. Transgender Tapestry #115.
2008
2007 “Informal Logic and Intersectionality.” 2007. in H. V. Hansen and R. C. Pinto, (eds.),
Reason Reclaimed, ValePress.
2007
2006 “The Feminist Crossdresser.” 2006 in
Trans/Forming Feminisms, edited by Krista Scott-Dixon. Toronto: Sumach Press.
2006
2004 Hample, D. Arguing : Exchanging Reasons Face to Face. 2004 [Released in 2006.] Informal Logic.
2004
2004 “Docter, Richard F. 2004. From Man to Woman: The Transgender Journey of Virginia Prince.” Northridge, CA: Docter Press. Transgender Tapestry.
2004
2003 “Makau, J.M. & Marty, D. L. Cooperative Argumentation: A Model for Deliberative Community.” 2003. Informal Logic.
2003
2003 “Bloom, Amy. 2003. Normal: Transsexual CEOs, Crossdressing Cops, and Hermaphrodites with Attitude. Transgender Tapestry .
2003
2000 “A Sometime Woman: Gender Choice and Cross-Socialization.” 2000. In Felicity, Haynes & McKenna, Tarquam.
Unseen Genders: Beyond the Binaries. Pp. 43-52. New York: Peter Lang.
2000
1998 “G. Colwell, You Won’t Believe This, But.” 1998. Argumentation.
1998
1997 “Beyond Appearances: Transgenderism and Gendered Rationality.” 1997. In
Gender Blending. pp. 58-69. Bonnie Bullough, Vern L. Bullough, and James ELias, eds., Buffalo: Prometheus Press.
1997
Books
Arguing with People 2014 Broadview Press
2014
How To Win An Argument, 2008. 3rd Revised Edition. UPA.
2008
Coalescent Argumentation, 1997. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1997
How To Win An Argument, 1996. 2nd Revised Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Translated into Japanese, Swedish, Polish, and Spanish.)
1996
Hostile Takeover, 1988. SC Entertainment, Toronto. George Mihalka, Dir.
1988
Yellow Angel. 1985. New York: Simon & Schuster Pocketbooks.
1985
Office Party. 1981. New York: Linden Press/Simon & Schuster.
1981
How To Win An Argument, 1979. New York: McGraw-Hill.
1979
Journal Articles
2009. Defeating Bigenderism: Changing gender assumptions in the 21st century.
Hypatia 24 (3):93-112.
2009
2007 “Natural Normativity: Argumentation Theory as an Engaged Discipline.” 2007.
Informal Logic. 27:2:149-161.
2007
2005 Booth, W. C. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication Informal Logic 27:3:303-304
2005
2004 “Introduction: Argumentation Theory & Artificial Intelligence.” 2004.
Informal Logic 22: 191-194.
2004
2004 “E-motion: Moving Toward the Utilization of Artificial Emotion.” 2004. Gilbert, Michael A., and Chris Reed
Informal Logic 22: 275-91.
2004
2002 “Robert J. Rowe. Bert & Lori: The Autobiography of a Crossdresser.” 2002. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 31:2:221-222.
2002
2002 “Deirdre McCloskey. Crossing.” 2002. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 31:2:222-225.
2002
2002 “Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy.” 2002.
Argumentation. 16:1:21-32.
2002
2001 “Emotional Messages.” 2001. 15:3:239:249.
Argumentation. 15:3:239:249.
2001
2000 “The Transgendered Philosopher.” 2000
International Journal of Transgenderism. Volume 4, Number 3, July – September. [http://www.symposion.com/ijt/index.htm]
2000
1999 “L. Feinberg, Transgender Warrior.” 1999. Journal of Homosexuality. 38:3:154-156.
1999
1996 “D. Walton, Emotion in Everyday Argument.” 1996. Philosophy Of The Social Sciences.
1996
1996 “The Delimitation of ‘Argument’.” 1996
Inquiry. 15:1:63-75.
1996
1995 “Feminism, Argumentation & Coalescence.” 1995.
Informal Logic, 16:2:95-113.
1995
1995 “Coalescent Argumentation.” 1995.
Argumentation, 9:5:837-852.
1995
1995 “Argument & Arguers.” 1995.
Teaching Philosophy, 18:2:125-138.
1995
1994 “Multi-Modal Argumentation.” 1994.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 24:2:159-177.
1994
1993 “C.A. Willard, A Theory of Argumentation.” 1993. Philosophy Of The Social Sciences, 23:2:257-262.
1993
1993 “The Enthymeme Buster: A Heuristic Procedure for Position Exploration In Dialogic Dispute”. 1993.
Informal Logic. 13: 3:159-166.
1993
1985 “D. Hitchcock, Critical Reasoning.” 1985. Dialogue, Spring, 24:1:559-562.
1985
1983 “Interview On An April Afternoon.” 1983.
Matrix, Spring.
1983
1982 “Heaven-57.” 1982.
Nebula, Winter.
1982
1978 “Susan Haack, Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues.” 1978. Philosophy of Science. 45:1:149-151.
1978
1976 “A Heuristic Procedure For Natural Deduction Using Reductio Ad Absurdum.” 1976.
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 17: 4.
1976
Professional Journal Articles
2000 “Deirdre McCloskey. Crossing.” 2000. The Globe and Mail. 22 January 2000, p. D5.
2000
1996 “M. Bloch, The Duchess of Windsor.” 1996. Toronto Globe and Mail. 17 August.
1996
1996 “L. Feinberg, Transgender Warriors.” 1996. Toronto Globe & Mail, 27 July.
1996
1994 “K. Bornstein, Gender Outlaw.” 1994. Toronto Globe & Mail, 24 Dec.
1994
1994 “B. Levin, A World Elsewhere.” 1994. Toronto Globe & Mail, 9 July.
1994
1986 “Gideon finds the Truth.” 1986.
Now Magazine, 5:33, April.
1986
Published Reviews
2006 “Moving Stages in Pragma-Dialectics,” in F. H. v. Eemeren, P. Houstlosser, C. A. Willard and J. A. Blair, (eds.),
ISSA, Sic Sat, Amsterdam. Amsterdam, Holland June 25-28, 2006
2006
2005 “Der Philosoph jenseits der Geschlechter.” 2005. Tr. Julia. http://people.freenet.de/Jula.Me/tgphilosopher.htm#_Toc103603734 Translation of “The Transgendered Philosopher.” 2000.
2005
2005 “Argument Use in Gendered Contexts.” 2005. In David Hitchcock & Daniel [ed. Ass't] Farr, (eds.),
The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18-21 May 2005, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation,, Hamilton, ON, pp. 139-147.Published as Gilbert, Miqqi Alicia.
2005
2004 “Emotion, Argumentation & Informal Logic.” 2004 [Released in 2006.]
Informal Logic.
2004
2004 “Emotion and the Pragma-Dialectic Model.” 2004. In The Practice of Argumentation, edited by Frans. H. van Eemeren and Peter Houstlosser. Holland: Walter Benjamins.
2004
2003 “Let’s Talk: Emotion and the Pragma-Dialectic Model.”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam, 2002, Frans van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, & Charles A. Willard, eds. 2003
2003
2003 “Commentary on P. Courtenay Hall’s ‘The Limits of Critical Thinking’.”
Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference. J. Anthony Blair, Daniel Farr, Hans V. Hansen, Ralph H. Johnson, & Christopher W. Tindale (Eds.). Windsor, ON: OSSA, 2003
2003
2003 “But why call it an Argument?: In Defense of the Linguistically Inexplicable”
Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference. J. Anthony Blair, Daniel Farr, Hans V. Hansen, Ralph H. Johnson, & Christopher W. Tindale (Eds.). Windsor, ON: OSSA, 2003
2003
2003 “Acercándose a los Estudiantes: Haciendo El Pensamiento Crítico Real.” Keynote Adress. [“Going to the Students: Making Critical Thinking Real”] Primer Congreso de Egresados de la Maestría en Educación del Sistema Tecnológico de Monterrey. Monterrey, México, August 2002. In Proceedings of same 2003.
2003
2003 “'The Persuasion Machine: An Exercise in Argumentation and Computational Linguistics.” Gilbert, M. A., Grasso, F., Groarke, L., Gurr, C. and Gerlofs, J.: 2003. in Reed, C. and T. J. Normoan, (eds.),
Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.1-4020-1811-8
2003
2001 “Ideal Argumentation.” 2001.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. Windsor, Ontario.
2001
2001 “Getting Good Value: Facts, Values, and Goals In Computational Linguistics.” 2001. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science, San Francisco, May 2001.
2001
2000 “Agreement/Disagreement.” 2000.
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. Hans Hansen & Chris Tindale, Eds.
2000
1999 “Language, Words and Expressive Speech Acts.” 1999.
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Frans van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, & Charles A. Willard, Eds. pp. 231-234.
1999
1998 “Prolegomenon to a Pragmatics of Emotion.” 1998.
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, CD-ROM.
1998
1996 “Goals In Argumentation.” 1996.
Proceedings of the Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning Symposium. Bonn, Germany, 1996. Springer-Verlag.
1996
1995 “Why Do Argumentation Theorists Quarrel With Their Mates? Or, What Is an Emotional Argument?” 1995.
Proceedings of the 1994 ISSA Conference, Amsterdam. Amsterdam: SicSat.
1995